It came out Tuesday the news that Finance Minister Sri Mulyani would be replaced late February regarding its role in the case of Century Bank. This information mainly comes from the Golkar Party, who hurriedly filed a Anggito Abimanyu as the best candidate for the post of finance minister.
Wimar Witoelar, a former spokesman Wahid and communications experts say, Golkar this maneuver to save Aburizal Bakrie. So now in the hands of SBY, whether he will finish this dilemma by moral or political. Follow responses to Radio Netherlands Worldwide:
According Wimar Witoelar, President SBY clearly attacked by Bakrie, Golkar and friends that one time there are only two possibilities occur. Or Golkar won, he fell or reached an accommodation Golkar with President SBY and both agreed dismiss Sri Mulyani. So if there is now speculation that this is only SBY chose political accommodation or choose his staff maintain a clean and reformist.
If SBY defended his staff, was positive. Means running a line that started the reform since he was selected as a candidate wakl Boediono president. SBY did have the character to allow the crystallization of the situation before he took keputusab end. Actually a lot of cues that SBY is positive, for example by saying approve bailout Century Bank and did not agree dismiss Sri Mulyani and Boediono.
If Sri Mulyani was removed, then the most benefit from the Golkar was the most common loss is the citizens who save money in the bank, who want security at the bank, and foreign investors. The whole financial system would be complicated. But not until the collapse when replaced by people who have the economic capacity as Anggito Abimanyu. He is a skilled and clean but he was not a fighter like Sri Mulyani. So Wimar. "So we'll go back to the mild reforms that I do not know what the result will be reached".
For Golkar, replacement Sri anyone is better if not Sri Mulyani. Golkar also can not disagree reform. For a while they want to Aburizal Bakrie saved from the tax claims for the tax court is being prepared.
It's like the court Thaksin in Thailand. Thaksni desperately mempertahanklan themselves because inginmempertahankan money stolen from the state. Same with Bakrie. We'll see what will diselsaikan morally or politically.
Wahid had complete moral corruption. Prove he fell. Now, nine years later, people see what Gus Dur's greatness, because as the president must choose whether to survive or provide a new path for his country.
According Wimar Witoelar, SBY will benefit if the Sri Mulyani was not removed. Because SBY won with 60% vote of the people and they were now not talking. The talk was only a few members of the House of Representatives, Special Committee, newspapers and TV, all commanded by a corrupt person.
So if returned to the people, if he asked for support of the people of the SBY will win. Support the people that do not have to pass a referendum, could be seen from Twitter, Facebook, and blogs. Very strong support. Maybe SBY is not used to working directly with the people even though he winning 60% of the people's mandate. And it still exists.
- Blogger Comment
- Facebook Comment
Langganan:
Posting Komentar
(
Atom
)
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar
Sundul gan! Ane ga kenal yang namanya spam...